Udit P. Sigdel, Durga Devkota, Narayan R. Joshi, Naba R. Devkota


Present study was conducted to assess the impacts of result demonstration on System of Rice Intensification (SRI) adoption in Chitwan, Nepal in 2011. The survey research design was used whereas purposive and cluster sampling was followed to collect the information. The study was conducted in Gunjanagar Village Development Committee (VDC) of Chitwan district which was purposively selected because of implementation of result demonstration by District Agricultural Development Office (DADO) Chitwan during 2009. A total of 176 respondents were identified including 6 demonstrator farmers, 124 participant farmers, and 46 non-participant farmers. A pre-tested and standard interview schedule was employed for household survey to collect primary information. The findings revealed that only six respondents had been continued to follow SRI. Improper implementation of demonstration, poor monitoring and evaluation, poor supply of information materials were the reasons to have low adoption of SRI among participant farmers. Lack of information, training, alternate SRI techniques and suitable land were the reasons to have low level of adoption of SRI among non-participants. Trainings conducted on SRI also did not have effective impact to improve the knowledge of the participant farmers. Relevant effective trainings on SRI, proper selection and prior supply of the informative materials enhance SRI to increase rice production in Chitwan district for both types of farmers.


SRI, adoption, result demonstration


Adesina, A., Mbila, D., Nkamleu, G., & Endamana, D. (2000). Econometric analysis of the determnants of adoption of alley farming by farmers in the forest zone of southeast cameroon. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 255-265.

Farooq, M., Kobayashi, N., Wahid, A., Ito, O., & Basra, S. (2009). Strategies for producing more rice with less water . Advances in Agronomy , 351-536.

Marenya, P. P., & Barrett, C. B. (2007). Household-level determinants of adoption of improved natural resources management practices among smallholder farmers in western Kenya. Food Policy, 515-536.

MoAC. (2011). Statistical Information of Nepalese Agriculture 2009/10. Kathmandu: Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives: Government of Nepal.

MoF. (2013). Economic Survey: Fiscal year 2012/13. Kathmandu: Ministry of Finance: Government of Nepal.

Namara , R., Weligamage, P., & Barker, R. (2003). Prospects for adopting system of rice intensification in Sri Lanka. Colambo: IWMI.

Ntege-Nanyeenya, W., Mugisa-Mutetitka, M., Mwangi, W., & Verkuijl, H. (1997). An assessment of factors affwcting adoption of maize production technologies in Iganga district, Uganda. Iganga: CIMMYT.

Sall, S., Norman , D., & Featherstone, A. (2000). Quantitaitve assessment of improved rice variety adoption:the farmer's perspective . Agricultural Systems , 129-144.

Sarwar, M., & Goheer, M. (2007). Adoption and impact of zero tillage technology for wheat in rice-wheat system-water and cost saving technology . Punjab: Ministry of Agriculture, India.

Satyanarayana , A., Thiyagarajan, T. M., & uphoff, N. (2004). Abstract on opportunities for water saving with higher yied using the system of rice intensification. Killikulam: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Satyanarayana, A., Thiyagaraian, T. M., & Uphoff, N. (2007). Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification. Irrigation Science, 99-115.

Stoop, W. A., Uphoff, N., & Kassam, A. (2002). A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification from Madagascar: opportunities for improving farming systemes for resource poor farmers. Agricultural systems , 249-274.

Tech, c. (2011, July 22). Center for the study and development of Cambodian agriculture (CEDAC). Retrieved from Ecological system of rice intensification (SRI) impact assessment (2001-2003): /combodia/cambimp-ascdc.pdf

Thangata, P., & Alavalapati, J. (2003). Agroforestry adoption in southern Malawi: in case of mixed intercropping of Gliriidia sepium and maize. Agricultural systems, 57-72.

Tiwari, K., Sitaula, B., Nyborg, I., & Paudel, G. (2008). Determinants of farmers' adoption of improved soil conservation technology in a middle mountain watershed of central Nepal. Environmental Management , 210-222.

Uphoff, N. (2004). System of rice intensification responds to 21st century needs . Rice today, 41-44.

Uphoff, N. (2007). System of Rice Intensification (SRI) to enhance both food aand water security. Food and water security , 40-45.

Uphoff, N., Kassam, A., & Stoop, W. (2008). A critical assessment of a desk study comparing crop production systems: the example of the system of rice intensification versus best management practice. Field crops research, 109-114.

Zheng, J., Xianjun, L., Xinlu, J., & Tang, Y. (2004). The system of rice intensification (SRI) for super-high yields in rice in Sichuan basin. Journal of Integrative agriculture , 110-1128.

Zhou, S. D., Herzfled, T., Glauben, T., Zhang, Y. H., & Hu, B. C. (2008). Factors affecting Chinesee farmers' decisions to adopt a water saving technology. Canadian journal of Agricultural Economics -Revue Canadienne Agroeconomie, 51-61.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2014 Udit P. Sigdel, Durga Devkota, Narayan R. Joshi, Naba R. Devkota

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.