IMPLICATIONS OF POLICY ON PUBLICLY AND PRIVATELY DRIVEN AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES: CASE STUDY OF COCOA AND PINEAPPLE VALUE CHAINS IN GHANA

Seth A. Manteaw

Abstract


This study sought to assess the implications of policy on the cocoa and pineapple value chains in Ghana. Using the multiple case study design approach, the study was derived from analyses of documents and interviews with different actors in the two case studies with emphasis on the value chain as a whole. The intention was to obtain the perceptions, knowledge and behaviors and their bases of the actors as perceived and interpreted in their own context. Results showed that policy environment that promoted public sector leadership in value chain functions and service provision, offered fewer incentives for smallholder producers in the value chain to translate their challenges into innovative behaviors. The study further showed stronger desire on the part of actors in the pineapple value chain to forge linkages and interact more strongly. This had translated into making service provision to the value chain more demand-driven and pluralistic. The study makes a case for greater space for private sector involvement in value chain functions and service provision, which is more likely to offer the platform for more interactive learning towards systems innovation


Keywords


Policy, cocoa, pineapple, value chain, publicly driven industries and privately driven industries

References


Alabi, R. A. and T. E. Mafimisebi, (2004): Increasing private participation in agriculture through privatisation. Paper prepared for presentation at the Farm Management Association of Nigeria Conference, Abuja, Nigeria, October 19- 21, 2004

Ahenkorah, Y., Halm, B. J., Appiah, M. R. (1987): Twenty Years’ Results from Shade and Fertilizer Trial on Amazon Cocoa in Ghana. Exp Agric 23:31-39

Appiah, M. R., Ofori-Frimpong, K., Afrifa, A. A., Asante, E. G. (1997): Prospects of Fertilizer Use in the Cocoa Industry in Ghana. Proceedings, Soil Science society of Ghana 14 & 15:216-221

Appiah, M. R. (2004): Impact of Cocoa Research Innovations on Poverty Alleviation in Ghana. Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences, August 2004.

Ayres, R. (1995): Privatisation and Regulation in LDCs: The Issues. In Development Studies-An Introduction Through Selected Readings, (ed) Ron Ayres, Greenwich University Press

Bailey, J. F. and C. M. Ford (2003): Innovation and Evolution : Managing Tensions Within and Between Domains of Theory and Practice: In L. V. Shavinnina(ed) The International Handbook on Innovation pp 248-257 Oxford: Elsever Science Limited

Christensen, C. M. and M.E. Raynor (2003): The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Cambridge Mass: Harvard Business School Press.

Danielou, M. and Ravry, C. (2005) :The Rise of Ghana’s Pineapple Industry- from Successful Take-off to Sustainable Expansion. Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 93. ESSD Africa pp 1-58

Dormon, E, N. A., Van Huis, A., Leeuwis, C., Obeng-Ofori, A. and Sakyi-Dawson, O. (2004): Causes of low productivity of cocoa in Ghana: Farmers’ perspectives and insights from research and the socio-political establishements. NJAS 52-3/4, 2004.

Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (2000): Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organisational Capabilities. In G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson and S. G Winter (eds) The Nature and Dynamics of Organisational Capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006): “Five Misunderstanding about Case Study Research” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219-245.

Fold, N. and Gough, K. V. (2008): From smallholders to trans-nationals: The impact of changing customer preferences in the EU on Ghana’s pineapple sector. Geoforum 39 pp. 1687-1695

Furubton, E. and S. Pejovich (1972): Property Rights and Economic Theory: A Survey of Literature. Journal of Economic Literature 10 (4): 1137-1162

Hall, A. J., M. V. K. Sivamohan, N. Clark, S. Taylor and G. Buckett (2001): “Why Research Partnership Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements, and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor.” World Development 29 (5): 783-97

Hall, A. J. (2005): “Capacity Development for Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries: An Innovation Systems View of What It Is and How to Develop It.” Journal of International Development 19 (5): 611-30

Hall, A., Janseen, W., Pehu, E., and Rajalahti, R. (2006): Enhancing Agricultural Innovation; How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. World Bank, Washington DC

IFPRI (2010): Policy Benchmarking and Tracking the Agricultural Policy Environment in Nigeria. Nigeria Strategy Support Programme. Report No. NSSP 005, February, 2010

ISSER (2009): The State of the Ghanaian Economy in 2008 Institute for Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Legon

ISSER (2010): The State of the Ghanaian Economy in 2009 Institute for Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Legon

Kibwika, P., Kyazze, F. B., and Nassuna-Musoke, M. C. (2009): How Public Policies Enhance or Impede Agribusiness Innovation: Astudy of Fish, Banana and Vegetables Value Chains in Uganda. Study Commissioned by the Government of Denmark and the World Bank Institute.

Laven, A. (2007): Marketing reforms in Ghana’s Cocoa Sector. Partial Liberalization, Partial Benefits? Background Notes. Overseas Development Institute (Odi) Partial Benefits? Background Notes. Overseas Development Institute (Odi)

MMYE (2006) : Labour Practices in Cocoa Production in Ghana (Pilot Survey). National Programme for the Elimination of Worst Forms of Child Labour in Cocoa (NPEWFCLC), Ministry of Manpower, Youth and Employment, Accra, Ghana

Mytelka, L.K. (2000): Local Systems of Innovation in a Globalised World Economy. Industry and Innovation 7 (1).

Rajalahti, R., Janssen, W. and Pehu, E. (2008): Agricultural Innovation Systems: From Diagnostic Towards Operational Practices Agricultural and Rural Development Discussion Paper 38, World Bank, Washington DC, USA

Rajalahti, R., J. Woelcke and E. Pehu (2005): “Development of Research Systems to Support the Changing Agricultural Sector.” Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 14, World Bank, Washington DC

Rycroft, R. W. and Kash, D. E. (1999): The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century Science. Technology and the International Political Economy Series, A Cassel Imprint, N Y.

Singh, R. H., Rankine, L. B. and Seepersad, G. (2005): A Review of Agricultural Policies: Case Study of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. The Caricom Regional Transformation Programme for Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad W. I.

Tripp, R. (2003): The Enabling Environment for Agricultural Technology in Sub- Saharan Africa and the Potential Role of Donors. Natural Resource Perspective No. 84, April 2003. Overseas Development Institute

World Bank (2007): Enhancing Agricultural Innovations: How to Go Beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ World Bank, Washington DC.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Seth A. Manteaw

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.