Environmental Restrictions on the Exercise of Land Rights: European Experience

Galyna Moroz, Ihor Myronenko, Oleh Vivcharenko, Nadiia Kobetska

Abstract


The current land reforms in Ukraine are aimed at supporting the rational use and protection of land protection. At the same time, as a result of difficult social, political and economic conditions, the processes of exercising rights to land resources have become more complicated. Ploughed land reaches 57% of the total territory, which is the highest rate in the world. The purpose of the study is to determine the essence of environmental restrictions on the exercise of land rights in the context of new land relations based on the experience of European countries, as well as to reveal the conceptual foundations of land use at the present stage of legislative and regulatory issues. Modern processes do not meet the requirements of rational use of natural resources, violating acceptable ratios. Problems with the balance of nutrients in agriculture and violation of environmentally acceptable areas of the environment have become more acute. Rules on environmental restrictions are established on the territory of the state to resolve issues of land use and protection. Their compliance is a prerequisite for all executive authorities in the field of environmental restrictions, as well as for all individuals and legal entities that are users or owners of land resources. The practical significance lies in the justification of methods and tools for rationing restrictions on the protection of land resources, land management programs, as well as the use of recommendations and materials by state employees of land, environmental and executive bodies.

Keywords


Natural science; Agricultural sector; Research institutions; Experimentation Agriculture

References


Allen, C., G. Metternicht and Т. Wiedmann. 2018. Initial progress in implementing the sustainable development goals: A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13(5): 1453-1467.

Epstein, D. 2007. ‘Mixed salad’ policy of the “market fundamentalism” and pragmatism. Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest.

Gabbay, S. M. 2019. The structure of advantage and disadvantage. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.

Gorban, V. F., A. O. Andreev, V. O. Stolbovyi, S. O. Firstov and M. V. Karpets. 2021. Influence of the lattice parameter on physical properties of high-entropy coatings. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series “Physics”, 49: 61-65.

Khoroshkov, L. and N. Derevianko. 2021. Landscaping project for a private garden plot in the city of Zaporizhzhia. Scientific Horizons, 24(3): 68-74.

Korobko, А. 2021. Evaluation of flower decorative plants cultivars of Nemesia Vent in the conditions of Podillia. Scientific Horizons, 24(2): 99-107.

Korolchuk, L. V. 2021. Decoupling of economic growth from environmental damage: A theoretical aspect. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 8(1): 37-45.

Kurata, M., N. Matsui, Y. Ikemoto and H. Tsuboi. 2018. Do determinants of adopting solar home systems differ between households and micro-enterprises. Renewable Energy, 129: 309-313.

Linhart, Y. B. and M. C. Grant. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27: 237-277.

Miller, V. 2010. Problems of land management in Bavaria. Land Management, Cadaster and Land Monitoring, 1: 7-58.

Moroz, G. 2018. Legal environmental constraints: General theoretical aspect. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(2): 122-129.

Myronenko, I. V. 2018. The legal regulation of neighbourly water uses in Ukraine: Development prospects. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 5(2): 130-136.

Nachtergaele, F. and M. Petri. 2018. Mapping land use system at global and regional scales for land degradation analysis. Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (Lada) Project, Rome.

Pankratova, V. O. 2021. General principles of law as a source of

European Union law. Legal Horizons, 14(2): 111-117.

Parry, M. L., O. F. Canziani and J. P. Palutikof. 2019. Climate change: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Paskhalidis, Ch., D. Petropoulos, S. Sotiropoulos and L. Papakonstantinou. 2018. The European common agricultural policy and development of agro-food sector in Greece. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries, 13(4): 373-382.

Rembold, F., C. Atzberger, I. Savin and O. Rojas. 2013. Using lows resolution satellite imagery for yield prediction and yield anomaly detection. Remote Sensing, 5(4): 1704-1733.

Scott, J. 2020. Good intentions of the state. Why and how projects to improve human conditions have failed. University book, London.

Sorrentino, A. and R. Henke. 2018. The common agricultural policy after the fischler reform: National implementations, Impact assessment and the agenda for future reforms. Routledge, Rome.

Sosiedko, K. D. and M. Palmieri. 2021. Open land market in Ukraine: Pragmatics of the phenomenon through the lens of European experience. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics”, 8(2): 82-89.

Stoops, G. 2021. Guidelines for analysis and description of soil and regolith thin section. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.

Terrapon-Pfaff, J., W. Ortiz, C. Dienst and M. -C. Gröne. 2018.

Energising the WEF nexus to enhance sustainable development at local level. Journal of Environmental Management, 223: 409-416.

Vivcharenko, O. A., G. V. Moroz and N. V. Kokhan. 2019. Law enforcement issues in natural resource legislation. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. X(7(39)): 1559-1567.

Willer, H. and J. Lernoud. 2019. Current statistics on agriculture worldwide: Area, producers, markets, selected Crops. Research Institute of Agriculture, Sicilia.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.009.00.3963

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Galyna Moroz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.