Effect of intra-row spacing on plant growth, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill) varieties at mizan-aman, southwestern Ethiopia

Ashenafi Abriham, Demelash Kefale


The productivity of tomato is influenced mainly by environmental factors, agronomic practices and cultivar potential. Accordingly, a field experiment was conducted at Mizan-Aman, southern Ethiopia in  2016/ 2017 to evaluate the effect of intra-row spacing (20, 30, 40 and 50 cm) on the performance of three tomato varieties(Fetan, Bishola and Roma VF) with the constant inter-row spacing of 70 cm in completely randomized block design with three replications. Data on crop phenology, growth performance, yield and quality parameters were recorded and subjected to analysis of variance using SAS version-9 software. Results of the study indicated that both intra-row spacing and variety had a significant effect on phenology as well as parameters including; the number of branches, the number of fruit cluster and fruit per plant, fruit weight, total fruit yield, marketable and unmarketable yield and total soluble solids (TSS). However, the number of fruits per cluster, fruit shape index, titratable acidity (TA) and pH were significantly different only among varieties, while plant height was significantly affected by intra-row spacing. Closer spacing enhanced early maturity, while wider intra-row (50 cm) produced a maximum number of branches, cluster and fruits per plant, fruit weight, unmarketable yield and TSS. Generally, 20 and 30 cm intra-row spacing was found to be suitable for the production of maximum total and marketable yield. From the three tomato varieties, Fetan was early maturing with the highest total and marketable yield. The varieties were also significantly different in fruit weight, with the highest value obtained from Bishola followed by Fetan. The outcome of this study revealed that, the intra-row spacing of.30 cm and variety Fetan could be promoted for production in Mizan-Aman and similar agro-ecologies.


Intra-row; Titratable acidity; Total soluble solid; Fruit shape index; Pericarp thickness


Acedo, A., C. Thanh and B. Borarin. 2008. Technological Developments for Freshand Processed Tomato and Chilli. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC)(ed.) Training manual on postharvest research and technology development for tomato and chilli: 75-87.

Ara, N., M. K. Bashar, S. Begum and S. S. Kakon. 2007. Effect of spacing and stem pruning on the growth and yield of tomato. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production, 2: 35-39.

Balemi, T. 2008. Response of tomato cultivars differing in growth habit to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and spacing on vertisol in Ethiopia. Acta agriculturae Slovenica, 91: 103-19.

Charlo, H. C. O., R. Castoldi, L. A. Ito, C. Fernandes and L. T. Braz. 2007. Productivity of Cherry Tomatoes under Protected Cultivation Carried out with Different Types of Pruning and Spacing. Acta Horticulturae: 323-26.

Davis, J. M. and E. A. Estes. 1993. Spacing and Pruning Affect Growth, Yield, and Economic Returns of Staked Fresh-market Tomatoes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 118: 719-25.

Desalegn, R., T. Wakene and S. Addis. 2016. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties evaluation in Borana zone, Yabello district, southern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Brreding and Crop, 8: 206-10.

Dessie, T. and Y. Jobre. 2004. A review of the importance and control of Newcastle disease in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal, 8: 71-81.

Duguma, A. 2000. Variety and plant density influence on fruit yield and quality of processing types of tomatoes, A Master of Science thesis Duncan DB (1955). New Multiple Range and Multiple F-tests.

Ebrahim, M. and D. Ali. 2013. Plant spacing and cultivar affects yield components, qualitative traits and early ripening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). . Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5: 494-98.

Gemechis, A. O., P. C. Struik and B. Emana. 2012. Tomato production in Ethiopia: constraints and opportunities International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development. Resilience of Agricultural Systems against Crises: Book of Abstracts.

Getahun, D. and D. Bikis. 2015. Responses of Tomato Varieties to Intra-row Spacing Under Rain-fed Production. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 5: 171-79.

HabtamuT., W. M. and Y. Dessalegn. 2015. Physicochemical attributes of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties under Polyhouse and Mulching Conditions. Mediterranean Journal of Biosciences, 1: 38-49.

Kirimi, J. K., F. M. Itulya and V. N. Mwaja. 2011. Effects of nitrogen and spacing on fruit yield of tomato. African Journal of Horticultural Science, 5: 50-60.

Law-Ogbomo, K. E. and R. K. A. Egharevba. 2009. Effects of planting density and NPK fertilizer application on yield and yield components of tomato (Lycospersicon esculentum Mill) in forest location. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5: 152-58.

Lemma, D. and Z. Yayeh. 2003. Agronomic studies on tomato and capsicum. In: Helath E. and Lemma D,(Eds). Horticultural research and development in Ethiopia Proceedings of the Second Horticultural Workshop of Ethiopia, 1-3 December, 1992. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopia. pp. 153.

Meseret, D. R., M. Ali and B. Kassahun. 2012. Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) Genotypes for yield and yield components. . The African journal of plant science and Biotechnology, 6: 45-49.

Muhammad, A. and A. Singh. 2007. Intra-Row Spacing and Pruning Effects on Fresh Tomato Yield in Sudan Savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Plant Sciences, 2: 153-61.

Nego, J., K. Balcha and D. Belew. 2015. Evaluation of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Varieties for Seed Yield and Yield Components under Jimma Condition, South Western Ethiopia. Journal of Agronomy, 14: 292-97.

Papadopoulos, A. P. and D. P. Ormrod. 1991. Plant spacing effects on growth and development of the greenhouse tomato. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 71: 297-304.

Regassa, D., W. Tigre and A. Shiferaw. 2016. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties evaluation in Borana zone, Yabello district, southern Ethiopia. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, 8: 206-10.

Seid, H., K. Merema and W. Mestawat. 2013. Effect of intra row spacing on the growth and development of tomato. International Journal of Sciences, 10: 19-24.

Sharma, D., D. Chaudhary and T. Verma. 2001. Growth and seed yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) cv. Roma as influenced by levels of nitrogen and plant spacing. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 30: 95-96.

Tabasi, A., H. Nemati and M. Akbari. 2013. The Effects of Planting Distances and Different Stages of Maturity on the Quality of Three Cultivars of Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 5: 371-75.

Tigist, T. 2008. Evaluation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties for yield, physicochemical properties and storability under ambient conditionsHaramaya University, Ethiopia. pp. 36-75.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.008.01.3093


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Ashenafi Abriham

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.