Role of ‘one house one farm’ approach to improve livelihoods of smallholder farmers of ethnic and non-ethnic communities in Bangladesh

Md. Golam Farouque, Kono Yasuyuki


One House One Farm’ (OHOF) was a poverty alleviation project launched by the Government of Bangladesh in 2009 to reduce poverty and improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers. The research sought to investigate the impacts of OHOF project using the livelihood framework. This project was launched in Nalitabari sub-division of Sherpur district in Bangladesh as a pilot one with emphasize on smallholder farmers from ethnic and non-ethnic communities. A total of 148 households (68 from the ethnic community and 80 households from the non-ethic community) were selected through stratified random sampling technique. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview schedule administered through a face-to-face interview technique. The findings certitude that livelihood capitals such as human, natural, physical, social and financial of project farmers were found improved as compared to non-project farmers. The status of improved livelihood and overall improved livelihood outcomes for the non-ethnic project farmers were comparatively better than that of ethnic members. Since vulnerability contexts were different in each community, the project has intervened accordingly to reduce the extent of vulnerability. Though OHOF approach has improved the overall livelihood situation of smallholder project farmers and reduce their vulnerability to an extent, the project interventions were not equal for studied communities. Moreover, the project personnel were reported with more inclined to provide opportunities for the non-ethnic project farmers than that of ethnic ones.


One House One Farm; livelihood; smallholder farmers; ethnic community; non-ethnic community; Bangladesh


Arifa, J., T. Uddin and M. Islam. 2016. One House One Farm Project Impact on Farmers’ Livelihood in Bangladesh LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Maurtious.

Barney, K. 2007. A note on forest land concessions, social conflicts, and poverty in the Mekong Region Proceedings: International Conference on Poverty Reduction and Forests, Bangkok (http://lib. icimod. org/record/13134/file s/4945. pdf). Bangkok.

BBS. 2017. A road map for the statistical developmentBangladesh Bureau of Statistics.

Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development, 27: 2021-44.

BER. 2013. Bangladesh Economic ReviewFinance Division, Ministry of Finance. Bangladesh.

Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis and B. Wisner. 2014. At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters Routledge.

Cappelli, P. and M. J. Conyon. 2017. What Do Performance Appraisals Do? ILR Review, 71: 88-116.

Carney, D. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihood DFID: London, United Kingdom.

Das, N. 2009. Can joint forest management programme sustain rural life: A livelihood analysis from community-based forest management groups (MPRA Paper No. 15305).

DFID. 2001. Sustainable livelihood guidance sheets–comparing development approachesLondon DFID.

FAO. 2015. The economic lives of smallholder farmers Family Farming Knowledge Platform. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.

Farouque, M. G. 2017. Does Community-based Forestry Management Approach Improve the Livelihoods of Local People? A case of Sal-forest area in Bangladesh. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4.

Hussein, K. and J. Nelson. 1998. Sustainable livelihoods and livelihood diversification.

Islam, K. K. and N. Sato. 2012. Participatory forestry in Bangladesh: has it helped to increase the livelihoods of Sal forests-dependent people? Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 74: 89-101.

Lowder, S. K., J. Skoet and S. Singh. 2014. What do we really know about the number and distribution of farms and family farms in the world? Background paper for The State of Food and Agriculture 2014.

Mustafa, M. Y. and S. S. Ali. 2005. Prevalence of infectious diseases in local and fayoumi breeds of rural poultry (Gallus domesticus). Punjab Univiversity Journal of Zoology, 20: 177-80.

Sato, J. 2000. People in Between: Conversion and Conservation of Forest Lands in Thailand. Development and Change, 31: 155-77.

Sheheli, S., M. A. M. Miah, M. J. Hoque and I. Islam. 2014. Competency Assessment of the Farmers on the Application of One House One Farm Approach. Progressive Agriculture, 24.

Ullah, S. M. A., M. G. Farouque and M. Z. Rahman. 2011. Farmers’ perception of one house one farm approach. Bangladesh Journal of Extension Education ISSN, 1011: 3916.

———. 2013. Problem faced by the farmers’ in practicing one house one farm approach. Journal of Agroforestry Environment, 7: 77-80.

USAID. 2011. Nutrition and food security impacts of agricultural projects: a review of experience. USAID’s Infant and Young Child Nutrition (IYCN) project, Washington, DC, USA. United States.

Warner, K. 2002. Moving forward: developing pathways for sustainable livelihoods through forestry Second international workshop on participatory forestry in Africa. Defining the way forward: sustainable livelihoods and sustainable forest management through participatory forestry, 18–22 February 2002.

WWF. 2008. Livelihoods Outcomes: Study and analysis of changes in the livelihoods of bottle-neck level community forest users. Baluwater, 7660, Kathmundu, Nepal. Nepal.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.008.01.3074


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Mohammad Golam Farouque

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.