Factors affecting diffusion and adoption of agricultural innovations among farmers in Ethiopia case study of Ormia regional state Westsern Sewa

Ayalew A. Worku


The contribution of new technology to economic growth can only be realized when and if the new technology is widely diffused and used. Diffusion itself results from a series of individual decisions to begin using the new technology, decisions which are often the result of a comparison of the uncertain benefits of the new invention with the uncertain costs of adopting it. An understanding of the factors affecting this choice is essential both for economists studying the determinants of growth and for the generators and disseminators of such technologies. The study was to determine the factors affecting farmer’s adoption of improved agricultural innovation in Welmera district western part of Oromia regional state Ethiopia. Non replaceable lottery method and proportional to size sampling techniques were employed for the selection of 130 respondents; structural questionnaires and group discussion were used. Data were analyzed using Statistical tests like chi-square, t-test, one way ANOVA and econometric model Tobit was used to identify the effect of the hypothesized variables on the dependent variable. The result of the econometric model indicated that the educational level of respondent, total land holding, accesses to research and access to the extension were found significant to influence the adoption of improved potato production packages. The mean average age of sample respondent was 45-54. The independent t-test result shows that there was no significant difference between adopter categories in terms of age to the adoption of improved potato technology (t=1.747, p 0.991). From the sample household heads 13.85% of respondent farmers are illiterate and the remaining 86.15% are educated. Majority of high adopters have been educated from grade 5 to 10 Chi-square test also shows the significant difference between adopter categories of improved potato technologies (χ2=17.25a, P=0.004). It is time to look participatory extension approach which invites different stakeholders. FRG approach contributed a significant role in the diffusion and adoption of agricultural innovations.


Agricultural new technology, adoption, Farmers Research Group


Aikens M. T., Havens A. E. & Flinn W. L. (1975). The adoption of technology: the neglected role of institutional constraints. Mimeograph, Department of Rural Sociology, Ohio State University, Ohio, Columbus, USA.

Bandiera, O., & I. Rasul. (2006). Social Networks and Technology Adoption in Northern Mozambique. The Economic Journal, 116(514), 869-902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01115.x

Bekele, H. K., H. Verkuijl, W. Mwuagi, & D. Tanner. (2000). Adoption of Improved Wheat Technologies in Adaba and Dodola Districts of Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. In: Mexico, D.F.: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO)

ChilotYirga, Shapiro, B.I. & Mulat D. (1996). Factors influencing adoption of new wheat technologies in Wolmera and Addis Alem Areas of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1, 63-83.

Dasgupta S. (1989). Diffusion of Agricultural Innovations in Village India. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, p: 231.

Deressa A. (2009). Achievement and Challenges in Ethiopian Agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MoARD, Ethiopia.

Dooley, K.E. (1999). Towards a Holistic Model for the Diffusion of Educational Technologies: An Integrative Review of Educational Innovation Studies. Educational Technology & Society, 2(4), 35-45.

Feder G, Just R.E., Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of Agricultural Innovation in Developing Countries: "A Survey". Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32, 255-298.


Getahun, D. (2004). Assessment of Factors Affecting Adoption of Wheat Technologies and Its Impact.The Case of Hula District, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technology Change. Econometrica 25, 501-522.


Habtemariam, A. (2004). The Comparative Influence of Intervening Variables in the Adoption Behavior of Maize and Dairy Farmers in Shashemene and DebreZeit, Ethiopia. PhD. Dissertation University of Pretoria. Pretoria. 292. P.

IFAD, (2013). African agricultural development: opportunities and challenges. Statement by IFAD President at the 6th Africa Agriculture Science Week and FARA General Assembly.

Kivlin J. E. & Fliegel F. C. (1967). Differential perceptions of innovations and rate of adoption. Rural Sociology, 32, 78-91.

Langyintuo, A.S., Mwangi, W., Dialo, A. O., MacRobert, J., Dixon, J. &Banziger, M. (2008). An analysis of Bottlenecks affecting the production and deployment of maize seed in eastern and southern Africa. Harare, Zimbabwe, CIMMYT.

Matunhu, J. (2011). A critique of modernization and dependency theories in Africa: Critical assessment. African Journal of History and Culture, 3, 65-72.

Million, T., & Belay, K., (2004). Determinants of fertilizer use in Gununo Area, Ethiopia. In agricultural technology evaluation, adoption and marketing: proceedings of the workshop held to discuss the socio-economic results of 1998-2002 from August 6 - 8, 2002. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa.

Mulugeta, E. (2000). Determinants of Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices in Central Highlands of Ethiopia. The Case of Selale. M.Sc. Thesis Presented to School of Graduate Studies of Haramaya University, Ethiopia.

Pretty J, Toulmin C, Williams, S. (2011). Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9, 5-24


Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation. 3rd ed, 236. New York: The Free Press. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.

Sherry, L., & D. Gibson. (2002). The Path to Teacher Leadership in Educational Technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial] 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/volume-2/issue-2-02/general/the-path-to-teacher-leadershipineducational-Technology.

Shiferaw B. A, Okello J, Reddy R. V. (2009). Adoption and adaptation of natural resource management innovations in smallholder agriculture: reflections on key lessons and best practices. Environment, Development and Sustainability 11, 601-619.


Teklewold H, Kassie M, Shiferaw B. (2013). Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 597-623.


Tesfaye, Z., Bedassa, T, & Shiferaw, T. (2001). Adoption of high yield in maize technologies in major maize growing regions of Ethiopia. Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization, Addis Ababa

Full Text: PDF XPS

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.007.02.2864


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Ayalew A. Worku

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.