Motivations and needs for adoption of the agricultural decision support system cropsat in advisory services

Christina Lundström, Jessica Lindblom


This paper presents several strategies employed by advisors in relation to the use of a Swedish agricultural decision support system (AgriDSS) called CropSAT, which is free to use and funded by the Swedish Board of Agriculture. The research questions for the study were: How is extension affected and possibly altered when provided with CropSAT? 2) How can advisory strategies in relation to PA technology use be categorised? Fourteen crop production advisors were interviewed, and the collected data were analysed thematically. The findings revealed four different extension strategies in relation to CropSAT use: 1) I do not use it, 2) I use it if I have to, 3) I use it myself and tell the farmer how to fertilise, and 4) I use it with the farmer. The obtained results indicate that the strategies selected by the advisors varied based on the requests and needs of farmers, the advisors’ personal interests and competences, CropSAT functionality, and uncertainty about how to use it in practice. When using an AgriDSS such as CropSAT in advisory situations, the complexity increases because there are more parameters to consider, and thus it could be experienced as more difficult to make proper decisions. As a result of the combination of technology and agronomy, the advisors requested more support. We argue that this request must be met by research, the authorities and the companies responsible for developing the AgriDSS. We claim that in order to increase the use of AgriDSS to optimise crop treatment at the right time and on the smallest possible scale, there is a need for a change in mind-set by among both advisors and farmers in order to increase sustainability in agriculture.


This paper presents several strategies employed by advisors in relation to the use of a Swedish agricultural decision support system (AgriDSS) called CropSAT, which is free to use and funded by the Swedish Board of Agriculture. The research questions for


Albertsson, B., K., Börling, Kvarmo, P., Listh, U., Malgeryd, J., & Stenberg, M. (2015). Rekommendationer för gödsling och kalkning 2017. [Recommendations for fertilisation and liming 2017]. Jordbruksverket. JO15:19.

Alenljung, B. (2008). Envisioning a future decision support system for requirements engineering. PhD diss., University of Linköping, Sweden.

Aubert, B. A., Schroeder, A., & Grimaudo, J. (2012). IT as enabler of sustainable farming. Decision Support Systems, 54 (1), 510-520.

Black, A. W. (2000). Extension theory and practice: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 40 (4), 493-502.

Dreyfus, H. L. (1972/1979). What computers can’t do – a critique of artificial reason (revised edition). New York: Harper & Row. (This book is contained in the extended MIT Press edition (Dreyfus, 1992).

Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., & Nettle, R. (2017). Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 1-12.

European Parliament (2016). Precision agriculture and the future of farming in Europe Scientific Foresight Study. EPRS European Parliamentary Research Service. Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), PE 581.892.

Evans, K. J., Terhorst, A., & Kang, B. H. (2017). From Data to Decisions: Helping Crop Producers Build Their Actionable Knowledge. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 36(2), 71-88.

Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., & Burlingame, B. (2013). Sustainable Intensification in Agriculture: Premises and Policies. Science, 341(6141), 33-34.

Hochman, Z., & Carberry, P. S. (2011). Emerging consensus on desirable characteristics of tools to support farmers’ management of climate risk in Australia. Agricultural Systems, 104(6), 441.

Hoffmann, V., Probst, K., & Christinck, A. (2007). Farmers and researchers: How can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agriculture &Human Values, 24(3), 355-368.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge US: MIT Press.

Ingram, J. (2008). Agronomist-Farmer Knowledge Encounters: An Analysis of Knowledge Exchange in the Context of Best Management Practices in England. Agriculture & Human Values, 25 (3), 405–418.

Jakku, E., & Thorburn, P. J. (2010). A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems. Decision Support Systems, 103 (9), 675-682.

Klerkx, L., Stræte, E. P., Kvam, G.-T., Ystad, E., & Butli Hårstad. R. M. (2017). Achieving best-fit configurations through advisory subsystems in AKIS: case studies of advisory service provisioning for diverse types of farmers in Norway. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23(3), 213-229.

Kuehne, G., & Llewellyn, R. (2017). The wisdom of farm advisors: knowing who and knowing why. Available at SSRN: or

Leeuwis, C. (2004). Communication for rural innovation. Rethinking agricultural extension. Oxford UK: Blackwell Science.

Lindblom, J., Lundström, C., Ljung, M., & Jonsson, A. (2017). Promoting sustainable intensification in precision agriculture: review of decision support systems development and strategies. Precision Agriculture, 18(3), 309-331.

Lundström, C., & Lindblom, J. (2016). Considering farmers’ situated expertise in using AgriDSS to foster sustainable farming practices in precision agriculture. Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Precision Agriculture (ICPA), St Louis, USA, July 31-Aug 3.

Lundström, C., & Lindblom, J. (2018). Considering Farmers’ Situated Knowledge of Using Agricultural Decision Support Systems (AgriDSS) to Foster Sustainable Farming Practices: The Case of CropSAT. Agricultural Systems, 159, 9-20.

McCown, R. L., Carberry, P. S., Hochman, Z., Dalgliesh, N. P., & Foale, M. A.(2009). Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers: Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research. Crop and Pasture Science, 60(11), 1017-1030.

Matthews, K. B., Schwarz, G., Buchan, K., Rivington, M., & Miller, D. (2008). Wither agricultural DSS? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 61(2), 149-159.

Nitsch, U. (1994). From diffusion of innovations to mutual learning: the changing role of the agricultural advisory services. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.

Pannel, D. J., Marshall, G. R., Barr, N., Curtis, A., Vanclay, F., & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46 (11), 1407-1424.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. (3rd Ed.) London: Sage.

Power, D. J. (2002). Decision support systems: Concepts and resources for managers. Westport Connecticut: Quorum Books.

Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.

Rose, D. C., Sutherland, W. J., Parker, C., Lobley, M., Winter, M., Morris, C., Twining, S., Ffoulkes, C., Amano, T., & Dicks, L. V. (2016). Decision support tools for agriculture: Towards effective design and delivery. Agricultural systems, 149, 165-174.

Qi, J.G., Chehbouni, A., Huete, R., Kerr, Y. H., & Sorooshian, S. (1994). A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment, 48(2), 119–126.

Schlindwein, S. L., Eulenstein, F., Lana, M., Sieber, S., Boulanger, J.-P., Guevara, E., Meira, S., Gentile, E., & Bonatti, M. (2015). What Can Be Learned about the Adaptation Process of Farming Systems to Climate Dynamics Using Crop Models? Sustainable Agriculture Research, 4(4), 122-131.

Sundmaeker, H., Verdouw, C., Wolfert, S., & Pérez Freire, L. (2016). Internet of Food and Farm 2020. In: Digitising the Industry - Internet of Things connecting physical, digital and virtual worlds. Ed: Vermesan, O., & Friess, P. (pp. 129-151). Gistrup/Delft: River Publishers.

Susi, T., Lindblom, J., & Alenljung, B. (2014). Promoting sustainability: Learning new practices through ICT. In: Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning: Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Conference 2014: Volume 2 / [ed] O. Lundwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschmann, P. Tchounikine & S. Ludvigsen, Gothenburg, Sweden: Intenational Society of the Learning Sciences, 2015, Vol. 2, p. 743-744.

Thorburn, P. J., Jakku, E., Webster, A. J., & Everingham, Y. L. (2011). Agricultural decision support system facilitating co-learning. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(2), 322–333.

Turban, E., Aronson, J. E., Liang, J. E., & Sharda, R. (2007). Decision support and business intelligence systems (8th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Pearson, Prentice Hall.

Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017). Big Data in Smart Farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69-80.

Full Text: PDF XPS


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Christina Lundström, Jessica Lindblom

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.