Mapping Actor Diversity and Functional Roles in an Agricultural Virtual Platform in Uganda: Insights from M-Omulimisa
Abstract
Agricultural Virtual Platforms (AVPs) enable diverse actors to exchange information that addresses multidimensional farming challenges. This study examined the diversity of actors engaged in M-Omulimisa AVP and how their roles collectively facilitated information exchange. A qualitative case study involving four key informant interviews, document reviews, 21 in-depth interviews, and three focus group discussions was conducted. Data analysis employed the Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) framework. Findings revealed variations in the diversity of actors per domain, their attributes, and their functional roles. Actors belonged to all five domains of AIS: education and research, intermediary, enterprise, demand, and support structures domains. However, diversity within each domain remained limited, with several key actors, especially from the livestock sector, absent. Actors’ attributes indicated that the majority enrolled in the AVP by invitation, had interests focused on crop enterprises, and varied capabilities. Joining the AVP by invitation partly explains the limited actor diversity within domains and the emphasis on crop enterprises. Three role categories that jointly shaped the functionality of the AVP emerged: those assigned and played, assigned but not played, and not assigned yet played. In conclusion, the platform achieved diversity across the AIS domains but not within each domain. Actors’ enrolment through invitation reduced actor diversity, which subsequently limited the information sources. Further, the unperformed roles led to the evolution of roles on the AVP and undermined information exchange. This study recommends enrolment to focus on intra-domain representation of actors, especially for the livestock sector, while promoting other enrolment methods to ensure diversity.
Keywords
References
Aker, J. C., Ghosh, I. and Burrell, J. 2016. The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives. Agricultural Economics, 47(1): 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12301
Asanprakit, S. and Kraiwanit, T. 2023. Causal factors influencing the use of social commerce platforms. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4): 100172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100172
Ayre, M., Mc Collum, V., Waters, W., Samson, P., Curro, A., Nettle, R., Paschen, J., King. B. and Reichelt, N. 2019. Supporting and practising digital innovation with advisers in smart farming. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90: 100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.05.001
Babu, S. C. and Glendenning, C. J. 2010. Information needs of farmers: A systemic study based on farmer surveys. In Agricultural Extension Reforms in South Asia (pp.101-139). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818752-4.00006-0
Birke, F. M. and Knierim, A. 2020. ICT for agriculture extension : actor network theory for understanding the establishment of agricultural knowledge centers in South Wollo , Ethiopia. Information Technology for Development, 26(3): 591-606.
Chen, C. C. and Tseng, Y. 2011. Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework. Decision Support Systems, 50(4): 755–768.
Chen, X., Chua, A. Y. and Deng, S. 2018. Comparing the web and mobile platforms of a social Q & A service from the user’s perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(2): 176-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-06-2017-0149
Chen, Y. and Lu, Y. 2020. Factors influencing the information needs and information access channels of farmers: An empirical study in Guangdong, China. Journal of Information Science, 46(1): 3-22. Doi: 10.1177/0165551518819970
Clarke, V. and Braun, V. 2017. Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3): 297 298.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Ed). SAGE Publications, Inc
Eastwood, C., Ayre, M., Nettle, R. and Dela, B. 2019. Making sense in the cloud: Farm advisory services in a smart farming future. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.004
Emeana, E. M., Trenchard, L. and Dehnen-Schmutz, K. 2020. The revolution of mobile phone-enabled services for agricultural development (m-Agri services) in Africa: The challenges for sustainability. Sustainability, 12(2): 485.
Hall, A., Jansen, W., Pehu, E. and Rajalahti, R. 2006. Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to go beyond the strenghtening of research systems. In Enhancing Agricultural Innovation. The World Bank.
Hermans, F., Klerkx, L. and Roep, D. 2015. Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: Using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21(1): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.991113
Ingram, J. and Gaskell, P. 2019. Searching for meaning: Co-constructing ontologies with stakeholders for smarter search engines in agriculture. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90: 100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.04.006
Islam, A. K. M. N., Mäntymäki, M. and Turunen, M. 2019. Why do blockchains split? An actor-network perspective on Bitcoin splits. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 12(2): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119743
Jiang, G., Liu, F., Liu, W., Liu, S., Chen, Y. and Xu, D. 2021. Effects of information quality on information adoption on social media review platforms: moderating role of perceived risk. Data Science and Management, 1(1): 13–22.
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E. and Labarthe, P. 2019. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90, 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
Klerkx, L. and Leeuwis, C. 2008. Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation 28(6): 364-378.
Leavy, P. 2017. Research design:Quantitative, qualitative, mixed mthods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press
Maria, K., Maria, B. and Andrea, K. 2021. Exploring actors , their constellations , and roles in digital agricultural innovations. Agricultural Systems, 186: 102952.
Munthali, N., Leeuwis, C., Paassen, A. Van, Lie, R., Asare, R., Lammeren, R. Van and Schut, M. 2018. Innovation intermediation in a digital age: Comparing public and private new-ICT platforms for agricultural extension in Ghana. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 86: 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.05.001
Rajalahti, R., Jansen, W. and Pehu, E. 2008. Agricultural innovation systems: From diagnostics toward operational practices systems. The World Bank.
Sarker, S., Sarker, S. and Sidorova, A. 2006. Understanding business process change failure: An actor-network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(1): 51-86. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230102
Schut, M., Kamanda, J., Gramzow, A., Dubois, T., Stoian, D., Andersson, J.A., Dror, I., Sartas, M., Mur, R., Kassam, S., Brouwer, H., Devaux, A., Velasco, C., Flor, R. J.O.Y., Gummert, M., Buizer., McDougall, C., Davis, K., Tui, S. H. K. and Lundy, M. 2019. Innovation platforms in agricultural research for development. Experimental Agriculture, 55(4): 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479718000200
Swaans, K., Boogaard, B., Bendapudi, R., Taye, H., Hendrickx, S. and Klerkx, L. 2014. Operationalising inclusive innovation: lessons from innovation platforms in livestock value chains in India and Mozambique. Innovation and Development, 4(2): 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.925246
Tinzaara, W., Mulyamboli, M., Tamubula, I. B. and Tumuhaise, V. 2025. Farmers’ Awareness and Use of Mobile Phones in the Management of Banana Xanthomonas Wilt Disease in Uganda. East African Journal of Agriculture and Biotechnology, 8(2): 76-91. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajab.8.2.3473
Weyori, A. E., M. Amare, M., Garming, H. and Waibel, H. 2018. Agricultural innovation systems and farm technology adoption: findings from a study of the Ghanaian plantain sector. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 24(1): 65-87.
Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage Publishers Inc. https://lccn.loc.gov/2017040835
Zhu, L., Li, H., Wang, F. K., He, W. and Tian, Z. 2020. How online reviews affect purchase intention: a new model based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4): 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0308
Zhuang, W., Zeng, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, C. and Fan, W. 2023. What makes user-generated content more helpful on social media platforms? Insights from creator interactivity perspective. Information processing & management, 60(2): 103201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103201
DOI: 10.33687/ijae.014.01.5951
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 RACHAEL LUBOYERA NAMULI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






