Evaluation of Yield and Nutritional Value of Fodder Crops under Plastic Greenhouse Structure

Gholamhassan Ranjbar, MohammadJavad Babaie-Zarch, Hadis Hatami, Mohammadhassan Rahimian

Abstract


One of the challenges in arid and semi-arid regions, such as Iran, for fodder supply is water scarcity and poor quality. There are various strategies for producing fodder using less water. One of these is forage production under greenhouse conditions (plastic cover). This issue is also significant because the production of common greenhouse plants such as cucumbers and tomatoes is no longer profitable in many greenhouses due to an increase in their irrigation water salinity. To evaluate the feasibility of fodder production under greenhouse conditions, a study was conducted in Yazd, Iran, from 2022 to 2023. Crops were sorghum, corn, pearl millet, guar, amaranth, lathyrus, hairy vetch, fodder beet, and safflower. Fodder fresh and dry weight, plant height, and water productivity, as well as crude protein, starch, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber, were measured. Results showed that amaranth could produce about 74.1 Mg ha-1 fresh weight in 35 days. The mean fodder fresh weight for safflower and fodder beet was 93.6 and 238.1 Mg ha-1, respectively. The fresh and dry weight of fodder for sorghum during the year was 650 and 117 Mg ha-1, respectively; at least 5 times more than it in field conditions. The highest fresh weight was obtained for corn, Chavosh cv., by 105 Mg ha-1. The values of crude protein for sorghum, corn, hairy vetch, and amaranth were 10.7, 8.3, 21.9, and 21.0% of dry matter. The water consumption in greenhouse conditions was also about 30-36% of the field conditions. Results of the study showed that in arid and semi-arid areas, it is possible to provide the required fodder in plastic greenhouses with less water consumption.


Keywords


Crude protein; Fresh and dry weight; Forage crop; Livestock; Water quality; Water scarcity

References


Ahmad, H., Ahmed, U., Ullah, I. and Masud, H. 2023. Comparing fodder production of maize varieties under varied nitrogen levels. Journal of Applied Life Sciences & Environment, 56(4): 551-562.

Aghashahi, A.R. 2022. Strategic document of using potentials and improving productivity for self-reliance in livestock and poultry feed production. Iranian Institute of Animal Sciences Research. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), 166 p.

Al-Karaki, G.N. 2010. Hydroponic green fodder: alternative method for saving water in dry areas. In Proceedings of the "Second Agricultural Meeting on Sustainable Improvement of Agricultural and Animal Production and Saving Water Use. September 2010, Sultanate of Oman.

Al-Karaki, G.N. and Al-Momani, N. 2011. Evaluation of some barley cultivars for green fodder production and water use efficiency under hydroponic conditions. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(3): 448-456.

Anonymous. 2021. Agriculture Statistics of Iran, 2021. Ministry of Agriculture. Tehran, Iran.

AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA

Arslan, B., Ates, E. and Coskuntuna, L. 2012. Forage yield and some quality properties of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.)-fodder pea (Pisum arvense L.) mixtures, as affected by sowing rates in Thrace region, Turkey. Romanian Agricultural Research, 29: 255-260.

Ayub, M. A. N. M., Khalid, M., Tariq, M., Elahi, M. and Nadeem, M. A. 2012. Comparison of sorghum genotypes for forage production and quality. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 22(3): 733-737.

Esfahani, H. Z., Aminpanah, H. and Gandomani, H. D. 2014. Effect of planting date and nitrogen rate on yield and quality of forage corn. Poljoprivreda i Sumarstvo; Titograd, 60: 193-206.

Eshraghi-Nejad, M., Alavi Siney, S.M., and Aien, A. 2022. Investigation and comparison of the forage sorghum genotypes yields under water stress conditions in the southern region of Kerman. Environmental Stresses in Crop Science, 15(1): 31-41.

Espinosa-Robles, P., Espinosa-Mendoza, L., Pérez-Mercado, C. and Agustin-Martinez, J. 2009. Hydroponics maize forage production. Acta Horticulture, 843: 283-286.

Fazaeli, H., Golmohammadi, H.A. and Tabatatbaei, S.N. 2021. Effect of Replacing dietary corn silage with hydroponic barley green fodder on Holstein Dairy Cows Performance. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 11(1): 47-57.

Gao, W., Shou, N., Jiang, C., Ma, R. and Yang, X. 2022. Optimizing N application for forage sorghum to maximize yield, quality, and N use efficiency while reducing environmental costs. Agronomy, 12(12): 2969.

Khogali, M. E., Dagash, Y. M. and EL-Hag, M. G. 2011. Productivity of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris var. Crassa) cultivars affected by nitrogen and plant spacing. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America, 2(5): 791-798.

Marsalis, M.A., Angadi, S.V. and Contreras-Govea, F.E. 2010. Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. Field Crops Research, 116: 52–57.

Naik, P.K., Swain, B.K., Chakurkar, E.B. and Singh, N.P. 2017. Effect of seed rate on yield and proximate constituents of different parts of hydroponics maize fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87: 109–112.

Özköse, A. 2013. Determination of yield and yield components of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.) cultivars under the Konya region conditions. International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, 7(12): 1157-1160.

Rana, A. S., Ahmad, A. H., Saleem, N., Nawaz, A., Hussian, T. and Saad, M. 2014. Differential response of sorghum cultivars for fodder yield and quality. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural and Social Sciences, 2(1): 6-10.

Ranjbar, G.H., Beyrami, H., Tabatabaei, S.A., Shiran-Tafti, M. and Anoshe, H.P. 2024. Effect of conservation tillage methods in comparison with conventional tillage on on water holding capacity and soil organic matter amount (case study: Yazd). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 34(2): 299-313.

Rehman, S., Nizam, S., SaimaRubab, S. B. and Wei, X. 2023. Evaluation of Protein Content in Some Fodder Crops. Hamdard Medicus, 66(1): 14.

Shalaby, A. S., Rammah, A. M., Abdul-Aziz, G. M. and Beshay, M.G. 1989. Fodder beet, a new forage in Egypt. 1. Productivity and the chemical analysis of some Fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars sown at different locations in Egypt. In proceedings of the third Egyptian British Conference on Animals, fish and poultry production. Alexandria, Egypt, 13: 133-143.

Sheykholeslami, M.B., and Naeil, M.K. 2010. The National Conference on Water Crisis Management. Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran [In Farsi].

Sneath, R. and Mclntosh, F. 2003. Review of hydroponic fodder production for beef cattle. Queensland Government, Department of Primary Industries, Dalby, Queensland

Taleghani, D., Sadeghi-Shoa, M., Moharamzadeh, M., Aghashahi, A.R., Sadeghzadeh-Hemayati, S., Mohammadian, R. Urazizadeh, M.R., and Hamdi-Holasou, F. 2019. Comparison of biomass and water use efficiency of fodder beet cultivars. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). 38 P [In Farsi].

Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597.

Varmazyari, A., Khalili-Mahaleh, J., Roshdi, M. and Kharazmi, K. 2012. Effects of nitrogen application and Time on fodder yield and some characteristics of Forage Sorghum var. Speed-Feed. Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(2): 587-593.

Yilmaz, S., Gozubenli, H., Konuskan, O., & Atis, I. (2007). Genotype and plant density effects on corn (Zea mays L.) forage yield. Asian Journal Plant Science, 6(3), 538-541.

Yurtseven, S., Guler, A. and Sakar, E. 2020. Effects of hydroponic media on forage and silage quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 18(1): 1601-1610.

Yusriani, Y., Usrina, N., Fitriawaty, Haiqal, N., Hayanti, S.Y., Qomariyah, M., Bakar, B.A., Idawanni, Nathania, N.M. and Sabri, M. 2024. Potential and utilization of sorghum in dry land as animal feed. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1297: 012023.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33687/ijae.013.02.5818

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Gholamhassan Ranjbar, MohammadJavad Babaie-Zarch, Hadis Hatami, Mohammadhassan Rahimian

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.