Multivariate analysis of selected wheat genotypes in Sindh province
Abstract
Understanding agro-morphological variability in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is essential for identifying traits associated with yield potential and for guiding breeding strategies under diverse agro-ecological conditions. This study evaluated 13 wheat cultivars at two contrasting locations, Petaro and Sakrand, to assess variability, trait associations, and principal component contributions. At Petaro, phenological traits exhibited wide variation, with days to heading and maturity showing coefficients of variation of 55% and 130%, respectively, while grain filling period (47-78 days) also varied substantially. Yield components such as grains per spike (24.6-506) and flag leaf area (12.1-79.2 cm²) displayed high variability, whereas grain-related traits (hundred-grain weight, grain dimensions) remained relatively stable. At Sakrand, similar patterns were observed, with days to maturity (120-137) and grain filling period (48-82) showing the widest ranges, while spike length and grain dimensions were comparatively stable. Principal component analysis revealed that the first four components explained 73.18% of the total variability, with peduncle length, flag leaf area, and phenological traits contributing most strongly. Correlation analyses highlighted key associations: at Sakrand, days to maturity and grain filling period correlated positively with peduncle length and plant height, whereas at Petaro, grains per spike strongly correlated with spike length and thousand-grain weight. Negative associations between days to heading and both flag leaf area and hundred-grain weight suggested important trade-offs. Overall, phenological and yield-related traits emerged as primary determinants of variability across environments. These findings provide valuable understandings for selecting wheat genotypes with desirable combinations of traits to enhance yield stability under varying field conditions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajmal, S., Nasir, M., Anber, H., Ammara, S., Zubair, M., Zaheer, A., 2013. Multivariate analysis of genetic divergence in wheat (Triticum aestivum) germplasm. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45(5), 1643-1648.
Debasis, P., Khurana, P., 2001. Wheat biotechnology: A mini review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 4(2), 1-24.
Dvorak, J., Luo, M.C., Yang, Z.L., Zhang, H.B., 1998. The structure of the Aegilops tauschii genepool and the evolution of hexaploid wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97, 657-670.
Feldman, M., 2001. Origin of cultivated wheat. In: Bonjean, A.P., Angus, W.J. (Eds.), The World Wheat Book: A History of Wheat Breeding. Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, France, pp. 3-56.
Khan, A.J., Azam, F., Ali, A., 2010. Relationship of morphological traits and grain yield in recombinant inbred wheat lines grown under drought conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42(1), 259-267.
Khodadadi, M., Fotokian, M.H., Miransari, M., 2011. Genetic diversity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes based on cluster and principal component analyses for breeding strategies. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5(1), 17-24.
Kimber, G., Feldman, M., 2001. Wild wheat: An introduction. Special Report 353, College of Agriculture, University of Missouri, Columbia, pp. 129-131.
Langner, T., Kamoun, S., Belhaj, K., 2018. CRISPR crops: Plant genome editing toward disease resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 56(1), 479-512.
Liang, Z., Feng, J., Li, J., Tang, Y., He, T., Nangia, V., Liu, Y., 2024. Grain-filling strategies of wheat of contrasting grain sizes under various planting patterns and irrigation levels. The Crop Journal 12(3), 897-906.
Liu, Z., Zhao, P., Lai, X., Wang, X., Ji, W., Xu, S., 2023. The selection and application of peduncle length QTL QPL_6D. 1 in modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 136(3),32.
Mujeeb-Kazi, A., 1982. CIMMYT report on wheat improvement. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp. 78-87.
Reif, J.C., Hamrit, S., Heckenberger, M., Schipprack, W., Maurer, H.P., Bohn, M., Melchinger, A.E., 2005. Trends in genetic diversity among European maize cultivars and their parental components during the past 50 years. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 111(5), 838-845.
Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R., 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Talbert, L.E., Smith, L.Y., Blake, M.K., 1998. More than one origin of hexaploid wheat is indicated by sequence comparison of low copy DNA. Genome 41, 402-407.
Wang, Y., Qiao, L., Yang, C., Li, X., Zhao, J., Wu, B., Zheng, X., Li, P., Zheng, J., 2022. Identification of genetic loci for flag-leaf-related traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and their effects on grain yield. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 990287.
Yang, D., Liu, Y., Cheng, H., Chang, L., Chen, J., Chai, S., Li, M., 2016. Genetic dissection of flag leaf morphology in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under diverse water regimes. BMC Genetics 17(1), 94.
Zarkti, H., Ouabbou, H., Udupa, S.M., Gaboun, F., Hilali, A., 2012. Agro-morphological variability in durum wheat landraces of Morocco. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6(7), 1172-1178.
Zhang, X., Liu, X., Wang, L., Zhao, Q., Yu, Y., Du, R., Xu, Y., Zhen, W., Wang, Y., 2024. Wheat yield and grain-filling characteristics due to cultivar replacement in the Haihe Plain in China. Frontiers in Plant Science 15, 1374453.
Zhao, W., Zheng, S., Zhang, A., Yuan, M., Song, P., Song, K., Li, Y., Xing, Y., Zhao, H., Niu, J., Wu, J., 2025. Large-scale identification and association analysis of wheat grain weight genes using rice orthologs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 138(8), 1-18.
Zhou, H., Riche, A.B., Hawkesford, M.J., Whalley, W.R., Atkinson, B.S., Sturrock, C.J., Mooney, S.J., 2021. Determination of wheat spike and spikelet architecture and grain traits using X-ray Computed Tomography imaging. Plant Methods, 17(1), 26.
Zhou, H., Riche, A.B., Hawkesford, M.J., Whalley, W.R., Atkinson, B.S., Sturrock, C.J., Mooney, S.J., 2021. Determination of wheat spike and spikelet architecture and grain traits using X-ray Computed Tomography imaging. Plant Methods, 17(1), 26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33804/pp.009.03.5455
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.




