Exploring the Notions of Agreement, Collusion and Concerted Practice in Competition Act 2010

Sayyeda Fatima

Abstract


Cooperative activities among undertakings have the potential to disrupt fair competition, making it essential to delineate which agreements, practices, or arrangements fall under the purview of competition laws. This article aims to evaluate the existing provisions governing agreements and practices within the framework of the Competition Act 2010 while drawing relevant comparisons with the provisions outlined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). It endeavors to address specific questions and considerations. Firstly, it delves into the fundamental elements and definitions of agreements and practices as specified by the Competition Act 2010. It then explores whether these provisions in CA 2010 align with or deviate from the corresponding articles within the TFEU, shedding light on potential convergences or divergences. Furthermore, this article examines whether there are notable resemblances or disparities between CA 2010 and TFEU in their definitions of agreements and practices related to competition. It scrutinizes the implications, if any, that arise from these disparities or similarities between CA 2010 and TFEU for undertakings operating within their respective jurisdictions. Finally, it highlights specific cases or instances, if any, where the interpretation of agreements and practices under CA 2010 significantly diverges from TFEU, potentially leading to legal challenges or uncertainties. Through this comprehensive analysis, the article aims to contribute to a nuanced understanding of competition laws in both Pakistan and the European Union contexts.

Keywords


Fair Competition, Agreements and Practices, Competition Act 2010, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Competition Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blanco, L.O. (2011). Market Power in EU Antitrust Law. Translated by Andrew Read. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Case 28/77. Tepae v Commission. ECLI:EU: C:1978:133

Case 41/69. ACF Chemiefarma v Commission. ECLI:EU:C:1970:71

Case 48/69. Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v Commission.

ECLI:EU:C:1972:70

Case C-199/92 P. Hüls v Commission. ECLI:EU:C:1999:358

Case C-277/87. Sandoz Prodotti Farmaceutici v Commission.

ECLI:EU:C:1990:6

Case C-373/14 P. Toshiba Corporation v Commission. ECLI:EU:C:2016:26

Case C-49/92 P. Commission v Anic Partecipazioni. ECLI:EU:C:1999:356

Case C-8/08. T-Mobile Netherlands BV and others v Raad van bestuur van de Nederlandse Mededingingsautoriteit, ECLI:EU:C:2009:110

Case T 18/03. CD-Contact Data GmbH v Commission,

ECLI:EU:T:2009:132

Case T-41/96. Bayer v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2000:242

Case T-7/89. Hercules Chemicals v Commission. ECLI:EU:T:1991:75

Case T-9/99. HFB Holding and others v Commission. ECLI:EU:T:2002:70

Competition Act No. XIX of 2010 (Published in the Gazette of Pakistan, Extraordinary, 13 October 2010

Competition Commission of Pakistan. (2016). Guidelines: Section 4: Prohibited Agreements. https://cc.gov.pk/assets/images/guidlines/guidelines_section_4.pdf

Competition Commission of Pakistan Order. (2008). Pakistan Banking Association and Others. 10.4.2008.

http://www.cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/Order_of_Banks.pdf

Competition Commission of Pakistan Order. (2010). Pakistan Poultry Association. 16.8.2010. http://www.cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/ppa_order_16_august_2010.pdf

Competition Commission of Pakistan Order. (2010). All Pakistan Cement Manufacturer Association (APCMA) and member undertakings Order. 27.8.2009.

http://cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/Cement%20(final%20order)%2027-08-2009.pdf

Competition Commission of Pakistan Order. (2010). Dredging Companies. 23.7.2010. http://www.cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/dredging_finalized_order_23_07_10.pdf

Competition Commission of Pakistan Order. (2011). Pakistan Jute Mills Association and Members Mills. 3.2.2011.

http://www.cc.gov.pk/images/Downloads/pjma_order_3%20feb_2011.pdf

Dashwood, A., Dougan, M., Rodger, B., Spaventa, E. and Wyatt, D. (2011). Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Law. 6th Edition. London: Bloomsbury Publishing

Dibadj, R. (2010). “Conscious Parallelism Revisited”. San Diego Law Review 47: 590-639

European Commission. (1982). Decision of 15 July 1982 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. Case 82/506/EEC - Stichting Sigarettenindustrie. OJ L 232, 6.08.1982, p. 1

European Commission. (1985). Decision of 19 December 1984 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. Case IV/29.725 - Wood pulp. OJ L 85, 26.3.1985, p. 1

European Commission. (1988). Decision of 18 December 1987 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. Case IV/31.017 - Fisher-Price v Quaker Oats Ltd – Toyco. OJ L 49, 23.2.1988, p. 19

European Commission. (1986). Decision of 23 April 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. Case IV/31.149 – Polypropylene. OJ L 230, 18.8.1986, p. 1

European Commission. (1991). Decision of 19 December 1990 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty. Case IV/33.133-B - Soda-ash - Solvay, CFK. OJ L 152, 15.6.1991, p. 16

European Commission. (2002). Decision of 18 July 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. Case COMP/E-1/36.490 - Graphite electrodes. OJ L 100, 16.4.2002, p. 1

European Commission. (2003). Decision of 11 December 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. Case COMP/E-1/37.027 - Zinc phosphate. OJ L 153, 20.6.2003, p. 1

European Commission. (2004). Decision of 11 June 2002 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty. Case COMP/36.571/D-1- Austrian banks - Lombard Club. OJ L 56, 24.2.2004, p. 1

European Commission. (2008). Decision of 23 January 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. Case COMP/38.628 - Nitrile Butadiene Rubber. C (2008)282 final, 23.1.2008, p. 12

European Commission. (2011). Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements. OJ C 11, 14.1.2011, p. 1

Ezrachi, A. (2012). EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases. Oxford: Hart Publishing

Faull, J., Kjølbye, L., Leupold, H. and Nikpay, A. (2014). “Article 101”, in The EU Law of Competition. 3rd Edition. Edited by Jonathan Faull and Ali Nikpay. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 183-328

Joined Cases 209/78 to 215/78 and 218/78. Heintz van Landewyck and others v Commission. ECLI:EU: C:1980:248

Joined Cases 29/83 and 30/83. Compagnie Royale Asturienne des Mines SA and Rheinzink GmbH v Commission. ECLI:EU:C:1984:130

Joined Cases 40/73-48/73, 50, 54 to 56, 111, 113 and 114/73. Suiker Unie and others v. Commission. ECLI:EU:C:1975:174

Joined Cases C 204/00 P, C 205/00 P, C 211/00 P, C 213/00 P, C 217/00 P and C 219/00 P. Aalborg Portland and others v Commission. ECLI:EU:C:2004:6

Joined Cases T 305/94 to T 307/94, T 313/94 to T 316/94, T 318/94, T 325/94, T 328/94, T 329/94 and T 335/94. Limburgse Vinyl

Maatschappij and others v Commission. ECLI:EU:T:1999:80

Joined Cases T-202/98, T-204/98 and T-207/98. Tate & Lyle plc and others v Commission. ECLI:EU: T: 2001: 185

Joined Cases T-25/95, T-26/95, T-30/95, T-31/95, T-32/95, T-34/95, T-35/95, T-36/95, T-37/95, T-38/95, T-39/95, T-42/95, T-43/95, T-44/95, T-45/95, T-46/95, T-48/95, T-50/95, T-51/95, T-52/95, T-53/95, T-54/95, T-55/95, T-56/95, T-57/95, T-58/95, T-59/95, T-60/95, T-61/95, T-62/95, T-63/95, T-64/95, T-65/95, T-68/95, T-69/95, T-70/95, T-71/95, T-87/95, T-88/95, T-103/95 and T-104/95.

Cimenteries CBR and others v Commission. ECLI:EU:T:2000:77

Joined Cases T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94 to T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94 and T-335/94.

Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV and others v Commission. ECLI:EU: T:1999:80

Jones, A. and Sufrin, B. (2014). EU Competition Law: Text, Cases and

Materials. 5th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Bael, I. (2011). Due Process in EU Competition Proceedings. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International

Van Themaat, W.V. and Reuder, B. (2014). European Competition Law: A Case Commentary. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing

Wendt, I.E. (2012). EU Competition Law and Liberal Professions: An Uneasy Relationship? Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

Whish, R. (2007). “Control of Cartels and other Anti-Competitive Agreements”, in Competition Law Today: Concepts, Issues and the Law in Practice. Edited by Vinod Dhall. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 39-58

Whish, R. and Bailey, D. (2015). Competition Law. 8th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33687/jsas.011.03.4864

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sayyeda Fatima

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Journal of South Asian Studies
ISSN: 2307-4000 (Online), 2308-7846 (Print)
© EScience Press. All Rights Reserved.