ROOT WATER-UPTAKE AND PLANT GROWTH IN TWO SYNTHETIC HEXAPLOID WHEAT GENOTYPES GROWN IN SALINE SOIL UNDER CONTROLLED WATER-DEFICIT STRESS

Masanori Inagaki, Ramzi Chaabane, Abdallah Bari

Abstract


A key breeding objective for bread wheat grown in the dry regions of Western Asia and North Africa is to enhance its adaptation to drought and its related salinity. Two newly-developed genotypes of synthetic hexaploid wheat, ‘SW-3’ and ‘SW-4’, their parental durum wheat variety ‘Jennah Khetifa’ and a dry-land bread wheat variety ‘Cham 6’, were compared for plant growth in saline hydroponic culture. They were also compared for root water-uptake and growth in soil culture in pots under combined water deficit and salinity stresses. Under saline hydroponic culture for five weeks, ‘SW-3’ developed a larger leaf area than the other genotypes. In saline soils for the period up to maturity, ‘SW-4’ and ‘Cham 6’ had higher root water uptake than the others. Only ‘SW-4’ developed normal grains and was clearly tolerant of soil salinity. ‘Cham 6’ developed normal spikes but ceased to fill the grains after heading. It may be assumed that salinity stress depressed root water-uptake at the early stages of growth, but the toxic effects of salinity stress increased in the later stages. The four wheat genotypes used in this study responded differently to salinity stress whereas water-deficit stress resulted in relatively few genotypic differences. ‘SW-4’ was more tolerant of soil salinity than its durum wheat variety parent ‘Jennah Khetifa’. This could be a useful genetic resource for improving ‘Cham 6’, which was relatively tolerant of water-deficit stress but sensitive to salinity stress after heading.

Keywords


Triticum aestivum, Triticum durum, Aegilops tauschii, synthetic wheat, drought, salinity, genetic resource, pre-breeding

Full Text:

PDF XPS

References


Blum, A. 2009. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crops Res. 112: 119–123.

Colmer, T. D., T. J. Flowers and R. Munns. 2006. Use of wild relatives to improve salt tolerance in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 1059–1078.

Condon, A. G., R. A. Richards, G. J. Rebetzke and G. D. Farquhar. 2002. Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci. 42: 122–131.

De Oliveira, A. B., N. L. M. Alencar and E. Gomes-Filho. 2013. Comparison between the water and salt stress effects on plant growth and development. In “Responses of Organisms to Water Stress”, Akıncı, S. (ed.), InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 67–94.

Dreccer, M. F., F. C. Ogbonnaya and M. G. Borgognone. 2004. Sodium exclusion in primary synthetic wheats. In “Proc. of 54th Australian Cereal Chemistry Congress and 11th Wheat Breed Assembly”, Black, C. K., J. F. Panozzo and G. J. Rebetzke (eds.), Royal Australian Chemical Institute Cereal Chemistry Division, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 118–121.

Dubcovsky, J., G. Santa-Maria, E. Epstein, M-C. Luo and J. Dvořák. 1996. Mapping of the K/Na discrimination locus Kna1 in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 448–454.

Farooq, S., M. L. K. Niazi, N. Iqbal and T.M. Shah. 1989. Salt tolerance potential of wild resources of tribe Triticeae – II. Screening of species of the genus Aegilops. Plant Soil 119: 255–260.

Feldman, M. 2001. Origin of cultivated wheat. In “The world wheat book: A history of wheat breeding”, Bonjean, A. P., and W. J. Angus (eds.), Lavoisier Publishing, Paris, France, pp. 3–53.

Gorham, J. 1990. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: K/Na discrimination in synthetic hexaploid wheats. J. Exp. Bot. 41: 623–627.

Gorham, J., C. Hardy, R. G. Wyn Jones, L. R. Joppa and C. N. Law. 1987. Chromosomal location of a K/Na discrimination character in the D genome of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74: 584–588.

Gowing, J. W., D. A. Rose and H. Ghamarnia. 2009. The effect of salinity on water productivity of wheat under deficit irrigation above shallow groundwater. Agr. Water Manage. 96: 517–524.

Grewal, H. S. 2010. Response of wheat to subsoil salinity and temporary water stress at different stages of the reproductive phase. Plant Soil 330: 103–113.

Iehisa, J. C. M. and S. Takumi. 2012. Variation in abscisic acid responsiveness of Aegilops tauschii and hexaploid wheat synthetics due to the D-genome diversity. Genes Genet. Syst. 87: 9–18.

Inagaki, M. N., B. Humeid, S. Tawkaz and A. Amri. 2014. Some constraints on interspecific crossing of durum wheat with Aegilops tauschii accessions screened under water-deficit stress. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 2: 7–14.

Kubo, K., I. Elouafi, N. Watanabe, M. M. Nachit, M. N. Inagaki, K. Iwama and Y. Jitsuyama. 2007. Quantitative trait loci for soil-penetrating ability of roots in durum wheat. Plant Breed. 126: 375–378.

Mori, M. and M. N. Inagaki. 2012. Root development and water-uptake under water deficit stress in drought-adaptive wheat genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun. 40: 44–52.

Munns, R. and R. A. James. 2003. Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant Soil 253: 201–218.

Munns, R., R. A. James and A. Läuchli. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 1025–1043.

Munns, R., D. P. Schachtman and A. G. Condon. 1995. The significance of a two-phase growth response to salinity in wheat and barley. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22: 561–569.

Munns, R. and M. Tester. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59: 651–681.

Nevo, E. and G. Chen. 2010. Drought and salt tolerances in wild relatives for wheat and barley improvement. Plant Cell Environ. 33: 670–685.

Ogbonnaya, F. C., O. Abdalla, A. Mujeeb-Kazi, A. G. Kazi, S. S. Xu, N. Gosman, E. S. Lagudah, D. Bonnett, M. E. Sorrells and H. Tsujimoto. 2013. Synthetic hexaploids: Harnessing speciesof the primary gene pool for wheat improvement. Plant Breed. Rev. 37: 35–122.

Passioura, J. B. 1977. Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 43: 117–120.

Reynolds, M., F. Dreccer and R. Trethowan. 2007. Drought-adaptive traits derived from wheat wild relatives and landraces. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 177–186.

Schachtman, D. P., E. S. Lagudah and R. Munns. 1992. The expression of salt tolerance from Triticum tauschii in hexaploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 714–719.

Siddique, K. H. M., D. Tennant, M. W. Perry and R. K. Belford. 1990. Water use and water-use efficiency of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 41: 431–447.

Sohail, Q., T. Inoue, H. Tanaka, A. Elsadig Eltayeb, Y. Matsuoka and H. Tsujimoto. 2011. Applicability of Aegilops tauschii drought tolerance traits to breeding of hexaploid wheat. Breed. Sci. 61: 347–357.

Thomas, R. J. 2008. Opportunities to reduce the vulnerability of dryland farmers in Central and West Asia and North Africa to climate change. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 126: 36–45.

Trethowan, R. and M. van Ginkel. 2009. Synthetic wheat – an emerging genetic resource. In “Wheat: Science and Trade”, Carver, B. F. (ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA, USA, pp. 369–385.

Valkoun, J. J. 2001. Wheat pre-breeding using wild progenitors. Euphytica 119: 17–23.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Masanori Inagaki, Ramzi Chaabane, Abdallah Bari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics
ISSN: 2305-297X (Online), 2308-121X (Print)
© EScience Press. All Rights Reserved.